Articole

Experimental Evaluation of Asbestos Fiber Dispersion from Degraded Asbestos‑Cement Materials Under Simulated Handling Scenarios

CL
C. LUCA
National University of Science and…
MB
M.G. BOBOCEA
National University of Science and…
NA
N. ADOCHITEI ( PRESURA )
National University of Science and…
CB
C. BORDA
National University of Science and…
CR
C. RADU
National University of Science and…
Vol. 1 / Nr. 1 pp. 255–265 Engleză DOI: 10.65631/JFD.1(37).2026.31
Journal of Fiability and Durability · 2026
The presence of asbestos-containing materials in the existing building stock continues to pose a major occupational health risk, particularly in the context of renovation, maintenance, and demolition activities. Although the use of asbestos has been banned across the European Union, numerous construction elements made of asbestos cement remain in service, and their degradation can promote the release of respirable fibers into the air. The aim of this study is the experimental evaluation of asbestos fiber dispersion as a function of material condition and the type of mechanical stress applied, under controlled laboratory conditions.
The methodology involved testing asbestos-cement samples classified according to their degree of degradation (intact and degraded) in three simulated scenarios: static handling, dry manual cutting, and mechanical impact. Airborne fiber concentrations were determined by phase-contrast optical microscopy (PCM), in accordance with the NIOSH 7400 method, used as an index method, while identification and morphological characterization were carried out by electron microscopy (SEM/EDX and TEM), in compliance with ISO 14966 and ISO 10312 standards.
The results highlight a significant increase in fiber dispersion with increasing mechanical stress, with the highest values associated with cutting and impact scenarios. Degraded samples consistently exhibited higher emission levels than intact ones, confirming the critical role of cement matrix degradation in fiber release. Granulometric analysis indicated a predominance of respirable fibers, with dimensions favorable for penetration into the lower respiratory tract. In addition, the temporal dynamics of dispersion revealed the existence of a critical interval immediately after the initiation of mechanical stress, characterized by peak concentrations.
asbestos cement; airborne fibers; occupational exposure; material degradation; particle dispersion.
Publicat
01.04.2026
CL
C. LUCA Corespondent
National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
MB
M.G. BOBOCEA
National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
NA
N. ADOCHITEI ( PRESURA )
National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
CB
C. BORDA
National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
CR
C. RADU
National University of Science and Technology POLITEHNICA Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
C. LUCA, M.G. BOBOCEA, N. ADOCHITEI ( PRESURA ), C. BORDA, C. RADU (2026). Experimental Evaluation of Asbestos Fiber Dispersion from Degraded Asbestos‑Cement Materials Under Simulated Handling Scenarios. Journal of Fiability and Durability, 1(1), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.65631/JFD.1(37).2026.31
[1]. Ridho, F. M., Ghani, H. N., Laksono, E. P., Faisal, A., Nurrahman, H. A. (2024). Occupational asbestos-containing materials exposure and risk of asbestosis among construction workers. Jurnal Ilmu Medis Indonesia, 3(2), 65–73.
[2]. Kurzhunbaeva, Z., et al. (2024). Occupational exposure to chrysotile in an asbestos cement factory. Environmental Health Perspectives.
[3]. Danish Society of Occupational Medicine. (2013). Occupational asbestos exposure and lung cancer.
[4]. Sørensen, M. K., et al. (2025). A systematic review of outdoor airborne asbestos exposure.
Science of the Total Environment.
[5]. Franken, R., et al. (2025). Comparing PCM, SEM and TEM for asbestos exposure assessment. Annals of Work Exposures and Health.
[6]. National Research Council. (2006). Asbestos: Selected Cancers. National Academies Press. [7]. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2020). Chrysotile asbestos systematic review. [8]. ANSES. (2014). Occupational exposure to asbestos and health effects.
[9]. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2012). Arsenic, metals, fibres and dusts.
[10]. Comisia Europeană. (2022). Comunicare a Comisiei către Parlamentul European, Consiliu, Comitetul Economic și Social European și Comitetul Regiunilor privind depunerea de eforturi pentru un viitor fără azbest. COM(2022) 488 final. EUR-Lex.
[11]. Comitetul European al Regiunilor. (2023). Aviz privind propunerea de directivă privind azbestul. EUR-Lex.
[12]. Hotărârea Guvernului României nr. 124/2003. Privind prevenirea, reducerea și controlul poluării mediului cu azbest. Monitorul Oficial nr. 182/2003.
[13]. JRC (Joint Research Centre). (2022). Towards energy efficient and asbestos-free dwellings through deep energy renovation. JRC129218.
[14]. Obmiński, A. (2022). Asbestos cement products and their impact on soil contamination in relation to various sources of anthropogenic and natural asbestos pollution. Science of the Total Environment, 848, 1572754.1
[15]. Ordinul ministrului sănătăţii şi familiei nr. 536/1997 pentru aprobarea Normelor de igienă şi a recomandărilor privind mediul de viaţă al 2populaţiei. Monitorul Oficial nr. 140/1997.
[16]. Virta, R. L. (2006). Worldwide Asbestos Supply and Consumption Trends From 1900 to 2003. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2006–1290.
[17]. Legea nr. 319/2006 a securității și sănătății în muncă, cu modificările și completările ulterioare.
[18]. Hotărârea Guvernului nr. 580/2023 pentru modificarea și completarea HG 124/2003. [19]. Sali L., “Asbestos and disease – a public health success story?”, Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health.
[20]. “Asbestos Exposure and Cancer Risk Fact Sheet”, National Cancer Institute (NCI).
[21]. Ridho F. M., Ghani H. N., Laksono E. P., et al., “Occupational Asbestos-containing Materials Exposure and Risk of Asbestosis among Construction Workers”, Jurnal Ilmu Medis Indonesia, 2024.
[22]. Obmiński, A., et al., “Pollution of the environment and building interiors during asbestos removal”, Scientific Reports, 2024.
[23]. Aryal, A., et al., “Mitigation of Contamination and Health Risk: Asbestos Surveying, Removal and Disposal Practices”, Sustainability, 2024.
[24]. “Global use of asbestos - legitimate and illegitimate issues”, Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 2020.
[25]. Pira E, Donato F, Maida L, Discalzi G. Exposure to asbestos: past, present and future. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Jan;10(Suppl 2):S237-S245. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.10.126.
[26]. Frank, A.L. Global use of asbestos - legitimate and illegitimate issues. J Occup Med Toxicol 15, 16 (2020)
[27]. Bağcı Ö., “Evaluation of Asbestos in Terms of Occupational Safety in Urban Transformation”, Dergipark (Turcia), 2022.
[28]. De Maria L., et al., “Clinical investigation of former workers exposed to asbestos (1994- 2020)”, Frontiers in Public Health, 2024.
[29]. Zhang Y.-L., et al., “Risk assessment of asbestos containing materials in old buildings, during demolition or remodeling”, Building and Environment, 2021.
[30]. “Asbestos - World Health Organization (WHO) fact sheet”.
[31]. O’Regan P., et al., “Asbestos Exposure and Compliance Study of Construction and Maintenance Workers (Australia)”, Safe Work Australia, 2010.
Scroll to Top